shacomm.com

Does restoring consumers’ trust start with engaging them on Twitter and Facebook?

A number of consumer brands have proven that well-constructed social marketing strategies are effective ways to gather intelligence, drive engagement and generate sales. But as the rise of social media coincided with an historic decline in consumers’ confidence in banks, many financial institutions have been burned by their attempts at social marketing.

That’s not to say consumers don’t expect financial institutions to have a social media presence—or that they can’t equally benefit from social marketing strategies. From March 22–26, Media Logic surveyed the social media efforts of 35 U.S. financial institutions and, based upon the findings, has provided the financial services industry some tips to make the plunge into social marketing less scary and more successful.

Think strategies, not tactics

Social marketing is still too often discussed as a set of platforms. “What are we doing on Facebook?” “What are we doing with Twitter?” “Should we launch a blog?” But Facebook, Twitter, blogs and other social platforms are just means to an end.

To get a better handle on social media, both why it works so well sometimes and fails so spectacularly others, it is important to stop thinking in terms of platforms and start thinking in terms of strategies.

Don’t be scared

As with e-mail and the Web-based marketing before it, it has taken a little time and a few mistakes for the rules of social marketing to emerge. A rumor has emerged that to engage in social media is to cede control of your message to the mob.

That is simply not the case.

Although it is true that picking the wrong social strategy can get an institution into trouble, understanding and pursuing the right strategy is now easy to do. To construct a solid—and safe—strategy, all you need to do is follow one important rule…

The community rule

With very few exceptions, social marketing strategies only work when they connect with a “community”—a reasonably large affinity group defined either by geography, elective association, mutual aid or support of a social cause.

Small financial service institutions, such as credit unions and hometown banks or institutions dedicated to serving tightly defined groups, are generally accepted as members of a community. There is a sense that the institution and the individuals it serves are locked in a mutually dependent, peer relationship.

Larger institutions are not typically considered part of a natural or voluntary community. To work around this problem, they need to sponsor or create natural or voluntary communities, separate from their general brand and products, before they engage in social marketing.

Selecting the right forum for your institution

Brand engagement forums are defined as any general “open for comment” forum dedicated to the brand and its products in general. These forums are built to facilitate an open conversation between a brand and its customers, partners and prospects.
Example: USAA Facebook Page

News feeds are “closed to comment,” one-way communication streams created by closing down the feedback options of social platforms. News feeds are a common social fallback strategy for financial organizations that are simply too big to be accepted as members of a community in the manner that local credit unions can be.

Example: Barclays Wealth Twitter Feed

Sponsorships are forums built or funded by the brand, but not directly managed. Sponsorships are a solid, low-risk strategy for any institution. To reap maximum benefit, institutions should take care in sponsoring events that support the brand’s mission and values.

Example: Bank of America’s Chicago Marathon Facebook Page

Reputation management forums are usually Twitter-based operations that assign customer service resources to continuously monitor social space for negative mentions and customer complaints, and to make semi-public show of addressing the issues identified.

Example: TD Bank’s Twitter

Special interest forums are typically multi-platform efforts focused on generating interaction around a topic or theme that has a general social benefit. Special interest forums could represent the future of brand marketing, allowing the sponsoring institution to create or attract a community around a topic of the institution’s choice. By providing a forum dedicated to a brand-related topic of community interest rather than the bank or its products, special interest forums avoid some of the pitfalls of brand engagement forums.

Example: Sun Trust’s “Live Solid” Facebook page

Social promotions are time-limited contests or simple invitations to engage and share, designed to build the follower and direct marketing base and ideally generate a viral marketing effect. Successful social promotions work for the same reason that all successful social strategies work: They appeal to a natural or voluntary community, but in this case the community is the one that surrounds the participant.
Example: Chase Community Giving Facebook Page

Final thoughts

As social media becomes a crucial component of promotional marketing, financial institutions will be forced to address the challenges presented by social technologies and social expectations. The lessons learned here should allow all institutions to begin to address the conceptual and organizational changes necessary to begin their move toward the larger goal of integrated social-centric, or “conversation-centric” marketing.

Ronald Ladouceur is executive vice president and executive creative director for Media Logic, an Albany, N.Y.-based conversation-centric marketing firm with extensive financial services industry experience.

Public relations pros are masters when it comes to crafting witty headlines. However, it’s important not to confuse the window dressing with the actual window. Without getting too postmodern/signifiers that signify nothing on you, let me offer this gentle reminder: a great headline is not the same thing as a great argument.

While this lapse in judgment can negatively affect your pitching, whatever you do, don’t let it seep into your personal communications. When you find yourself talking in sound bytes to your mom, your dog — or, even worse, a prospective employer — tossing off great theses as though they are capable of standing alone can be a real buzzkill.

Case in point: let’s say I’m interviewing you. (This could happen! This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ) You say, “Yeah, I don’t read blogs.” Full stop. Now, I’m willing to go there with you. That’s provocative! Why don’t you read blogs? Are you talking about all blogs, or just certain ones? What is it about blogs that perturbs you? Is this a new development in your life? Was there a time where you simply couldn’t get enough blog, and then, one day, shazam, the world of blogs lost its appeal?

You might believe that someone interviewing for a PR position should be immediately disqualified for lack of blogthusiasm. But  I can think of a bazillion ways to follow up this thesis statement with a compelling counterargument. Here’s one: when I can follow all of my favorite bloggers and publications via Twitter, who needs RSS feeds anymore? (Come on, that was easy.)

So, that’s my quick tip for you. Want to be taken more seriously, by me, your client, and journalists everywhere? Feel free to grab my attention with an outrageous thesis statement. But if you don’t follow it up with an actual argument, you’ve lost my interest — and my respect.

Not all failures are the same. Here are five kinds, from frequency = good all the way to please-don't!

FAIL OFTEN: Ideas that challenge the status quo. Proposals. Brainstorms. Concepts that open doors.

FAIL FREQUENTLY: Prototypes. Spreadsheets. Sample ads and copy.

FAIL OCCASIONALLY: Working mockups. Playtesting sessions. Board meetings.

FAIL RARELY: Interactions with small groups of actual users and customers.

FAIL NEVER: Keeping promises to your constituents.

The thing is, in their rush to play it safe and then their urgency to salvage everything in the face of an emergency, most organizations do precisely the opposite. They throw their customers or their people under the bus ("we had no choice") but rarely take the pro-active steps necessary to fail quietly, and often, in private, in advance, when there's still time to make things better.

Better to have a difficult conversation now than a failed customer interaction later.

Source: Seth's Blog

Most of the time, we think of our job as a set of tasks that take place in a ---> [box] <---.

It turns out, though, that if we go upstream and alter the stuff that comes to us, it's a lot easier to do great work. And if we go downstream and teach people how to work with what we created, the final product is better as well. Now, it's more of a --> [   box   ] <--.

A doctor can consider her work in the box of the examining room. But if she figures out how to get people to quit smoking before they come in, her results are better. If she figures out how to get people to take their meds after they leave, same thing.

A designer who receives a better project brief will deliver better work. A manufacturer who figures out how to teach users to use the object properly will get better word of mouth...

Marketers, of course, can have the biggest box of all. So the stuff we think of as 'marketing' can be altered long before the person ever sees an ad, and have an impact long after they've got the product.

The challenge lies in spending a lot of time and money on the upstream and downstream parts of the work, instead of always assuming that your [box] is just what happens inside your cubicle, or as a direct result of your actions.

Source: Seth's Blog